During May 16-22, 2024, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) conducted its own all-Ukrainian public opinion survey "Omnibus", to which, on its own initiative, it added questions about the attitude to the legalization of medical cannabis (in the form of a special experiment). By the method of telephone interviews (computer-assistedtelephoneinterviews, CATI) based on a random sample of mobile phone numbers (with random generation of phone numbers and subsequent statistical weighting), 1,067 respondents living in all regions of Ukraine (territory under the control of the Government of Ukraine) were interviewed. The survey was conducted with adult (aged 18 and older) citizens of Ukraine who, at the time of the survey, lived on the territory of Ukraine controlled by the Government of Ukraine. The sample did not include residents of territories that are temporarily not controlled by the authorities of Ukraine (at the same time, out of 1,067 respondents from February 22 to 24, 2022, lived in the territory that is now occupied), and the survey was not conducted with citizens who went abroad after February 24, 2022.

Formally, under normal circumstances, the statistical error of such a sample (with a probability of 0.95 and taking into account the design effect of 1.1) did not exceed 3.4% for indicators close to 50%, 3.0% for indicators close to 25%, 2.1% - for indicators close to 10%, 1.5% - for indicators close to 5%.

Under the conditions of war, in addition to the specified formal error, a certain systematic deviation is added. Factors that can affect the quality of results in "wartime" conditions were previously cited by KIIS.

In general, we believe that the obtained results are still highly representative and allow a fairly reliable analysis of the public moods of the population.

Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS), with the support of the USAID' Ukraine Confidence Building Initiative (UCBI), has conducted a survey on economic opportunities in the frontline and liberated Ukrainian communities.

The survey was conducted from May 31 to June 10, 2024, by telephone interview (CATI) in eight oblasts (Dnipro, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Sumy, Kharkiv, Kherson, and Chernihiv). Total 2,001 interviews were conducted as part of the survey, with about 250 respondents in each oblast.

National Democratic Institute (NDI) recently conducted meetings with political, civic and other partners to share its May 2024 public opinion poll, fielded in May. Since 2015, the NDI has conducted nationwide polling to assess Ukrainian public opinion on a range of topics related to its democratic trajectory, the geopolitical climate, and Ukrainians’ hopes for the future. This is the twenty-second iteration of this survey, and the sixth iteration since Russia launched its full-scale invasion. 

During May 16-22, 2024 and June 20-25, 2024, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) conducted two separate all-Ukrainian surveys of public opinion “Omnibus”, to which, on its own initiative, added its own monitoring question about readiness for territorial concessions for end the war and about the perception of certain possible peace agreements. By the method of computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) based on a random sample of mobile phone numbers (with random generation of phone numbers and subsequent statistical weighting), 1,067 respondents were interviewed in all regions of Ukraine (territory under the control of the Government of Ukraine) during May 16-22 and 2,008 respondents during June 20-25. The survey was conducted with adult (aged 18 and older) citizens of Ukraine who, at the time of the survey, lived on the territory of Ukraine controlled by the Government of Ukraine. The sample did not include residents of territories that are temporarily not controlled by the authorities of Ukraine (at the same time, in each sample, about 2% are Ukrainians who moved from the occupied territories), and the survey was not conducted with citizens who went abroad after February 24, 2022.

Formally, under normal circumstances, the statistical error of such a sample (with a probability of 0.95 and taking into account the design effect of 1.3) did not exceed 4.1% for the results of the survey conducted in May. In the June survey, an experiment was conducted and 2,008 respondents were randomly divided into three equivalent subsamples (644-694 respondents each) (see details below). The results were analyzed for each sample separately and for each subsample the error is about 5%.

Under conditions of war, in addition to the specified formal error, a certain systematic deviation is added. Factors that can affect the quality of results in "wartime" conditions were previously cited by the KIIS.

In general, we believe that the obtained results are still highly representative and allow a fairly reliable analysis of public moods of the population.

During February 17-23 and May 16-22, 2024, the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) conducted two separate all-Ukrainian public opinion surveys "Omnibus", to which, on its own initiative, added questions about how Ukrainians see relations with Russia, as well as what associations Ukrainians have about Russia and ordinary Russians. By the method of computer-assistedtelephoneinterviews (CATI) based on a random sample of mobile phone numbers (with random generation of phone numbers and subsequent statistical weighting), 1,052 respondents living in all regions of Ukraine (territory controlled by the Government of Ukraine)were interviewed  during February 17-23 and 1,067 respondents during May 16-22. The survey was conducted with adult (aged 18 and older) citizens of Ukraine who, at the time of the survey, lived on the territory of Ukraine controlled by the Government of Ukraine. The sample did not include residents of territories that are temporarily not controlled by the authorities of Ukraine (at the same time, in each sample, about 2% are Ukrainians who moved from the occupied territories), and the survey was not conducted with citizens who went abroad after February 24, 2022.

Formally, under normal circumstances, the statistical error of such a sample (with a probability of 0.95 and taking into account the design effect of 1.3) did not exceed 4.1% for indicators close to 50%, 3.5% for indicators close to 25%, 2.5% - for indicators close to 10%, 1.8% - for indicators close to 5%.

Under conditions of war, in addition to the specified formal error, a certain systematic deviation is added. Factors that can affect the quality of results in "wartime" conditions were previously cited by KIIS.

In general, we believe that the obtained results are still highly representative and allow a fairly reliable analysis of the public moods of the population.